Legal Opinion

Menefield v. Bd. of Parole Hearings

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided June 21, 2017No. C083356PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobie, J.

*390This case is about the validity of a regulation governing a circumstance the Board of Parole Hearings (the board) can consider when determining whether a person convicted of a crime punishable with an indeterminate life sentence is unsuitable for parole: California Code of Regulations, title 15, section 2402, subdivision (c)(6) (hereafter, section 2402(c)(6) ). Section 2402(c)(6) provides that an inmate's "serious misconduct in prison or jail" can tend to show his or her unsuitability for parole.

*391In challenging the validity of the regulation, petitioner first contends the regulation lacks…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In re LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Carman v. AlvordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. (HC) Jones v. MaddenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  2. In re KavanaughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API