Kellotat v. Cupp
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.
Petitioner appeals from a denial of post-conviction relief, contending that he was denied a post-indictment preliminary hearing in violation of his right to equal protection of the law under Article I, section 20, of the Oregon Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal constitution. Because we hold that the rule first enunciated in State v. Clark, 291 Or 231, 630 P2d 810, cert den 454 US 1084 (1981), and State v. Edmonson, 291 Or 251, 630 P2d 822 (1981), and first applied in State v. Freeland, 295 Or 367, 667 P2d 509 (1983), is not applicable, we affirm.
Oregon law permits a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. FreelandOregon Supreme Court · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Teague v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Moen v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Teague v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Teague v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002