Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Vicksburg v. Drexler

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1938No. 5660PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DREW, Judge.

This is an attachment proceeding in which plaintiff is seeking recovery on a promissory note alleged to be owned by and in the possession of plaintiff and to have been made by defendant!

Plaintiff is a national banking corporation, domiciled and doing business in Vicksburg, Mississippi. Defendant is a resident of Houston, Texas. Jurisdiction was acquired here by a writ of attachment under which defendant’s undivided interest in the succession of his alleged uncle, at the time in process of administration was seized.

Defendant filed a plea to the jurisdiction which was sustained by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Vicksburg v. DrexlerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Lewis v. BurglassSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  4. Flood v. City National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  5. John T. Hardie & Co. v. ColvinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smart v. WoodardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Leprettre v. RCS, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Chancze Leprettre v. Rcs, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API