Legal Opinion
First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Vicksburg v. Drexler
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 11, 1936No. 5326PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMITER, Judge.
The parties litigant in this proceeding are nonresidents of the state of Louisiana. Plaintiff is a national banking corporation, domiciled and doing business in Vicksburg, Miss., while defendant is a resident of Houston, Tex. The suit is on a promissory note. Jurisdiction of defendant is sought by means of a writ of attachment.
According to the allegations of the petition, defendant’s uncle, whose name was identical with that of defendant, died in Franklin parish, during the month of September, 1935, leaving a large estate. The will of said decedent was probated in the district…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gumbel v. PitkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Pugh v. FlannerySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Jackson State Nat. Bank v. Merchants' Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- Dearmond v. CourtneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857
- Noble v. NettlesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Noel v. Jumonville Pipe and MacHinery CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- Jackson-Hinds Bank v. DavisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Mingledorff v. American Bank and Trust Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Eden v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- First Nat. Bank of Vicksburg v. DrexlerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.