Legal Opinion
Lewis v. Burglass
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided November 30, 1936No. 34005PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’NIELL, Chief Justice.
Levy Lewis sued Abraham Burglass in the First City Court of New Orleans for $300 damages, alleging that Burglass had repossessed, without legal proceedings, certain furniture which Lewis had bought from Burglass, and had not finished paying for. Burglass, answering the suit, denied that he owned any damages, and set up a reconventional demand for $12.10, which was the unpaid part of the price of the furniture. The judge gave Lewis a judgment for $50 damages, and gave Bur-glass a judgment for the $12.10, and allowed legal interest on both sums from judicial demand. Lewis…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Farrow v. John R. Thompson Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Farrow v. John R. Thompson Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Gigand v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
- Campbell v. DevilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Abraham v. WallenbergSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lewis v. BurglassLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Hargett v. Chemical Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
- D'Angelo v. NicolosiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- Southern Premium Service v. OddoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- First Nat. Bank of Vicksburg v. DrexlerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.