Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 1999No. 22210PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROW, Judge.

Appellant, tried by jury, was convicted of murder in the first degree and armed criminal action. This court affirmed the conviction on direct appeal. State v. Armstrong, 930 S.W.2d 449 (Mo.App. S.D.1996).

Appellant thereafter filed a timely motion per Rule 29.151 to vacate the conviction, maintaining that the lawyer who represented him at trial (“Defense Counsel”) rendered ineffective assistance. The motion court denied relief after an evidentiary hearing.

Appellant brings this appeal from the motion court’s judgment. Appellant insists Defense Counsel was ineffective in three…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. State v. TokarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. State v. RousanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  4. State v. NunleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  5. State v. KenleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ham v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Dishmon v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Myszka v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. McCain v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Dyanthany Y. Proudie v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API