Legal Opinion

Dishmon v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 2008No. 28361PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY W. LYNCH, Chief Judge.

Melvin Charles Dishmon (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel, specifically arguing (1) that he was involuntarily coerced by his trial counsel into waiving his right to a jury trial; and (2) that he was prejudiced by trial counsel’s improper questioning of Movant at trial regarding the details of Movant’s prior aggravated assault conviction. Because Movant’s complaints were born out of reasonable trial strategy, trial counsel was not ineffective. We affirm.

Fact…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  3. Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  5. State v. BaxterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. EPKINS v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Antonio C. Jackson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. Barber v. HancockDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024
  4. Corey Gray v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. Darion Polk v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API