Legal Opinion

Stephen S. Marozsan v. United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 6, 1996No. 94-1512PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Per curiam

Pro se appellant Stephen Marozsan appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of the United States of America, the Veterans Administration, and several individual defendants in this action concerning the determination of Marozsan’s veterans’ benefits. For the following reasons, we affirm.

This court originally addressed Marozsan’s claims in Marozsan v. United States, 852 F.2d 1469 (7th Cir.1988) (en banc) (“Marozsan I”). Succinctly, Marozsan, who served in the U.S. Navy during and after World War II, challenged the 1981 determination of the Veterans Administration (VA) that he was to be…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Beamon v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  2. In Re Beverly B. MannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  3. Peggy Keith v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Glucona America, Inc. v. Ardisson (In Re Ardisson)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
  5. Beamon v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API