Legal Opinion

Storch v. McCain

California Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1890No. 13501PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.

Action to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the payment of a promissory note of eight thousand dollars. The central question in the case is, whether the note had been paid and the mortgage discharged before the commencement of this action. The court so found, and that finding is attacked by appellant, on the ground of the insufficiency of- the evidence to justify it.

The evidence shows that one John Belz had possession of the note and mortgage by authority of plaintiff, who testifies as follows: “ Shortly before maturity I sent the note to the First National Bank of Los Angeles, California,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spanagel v. DellingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Ponce v. McElvyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Morris v. PrestonIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Curtis v. SpragueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Ord v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Simmons v. LeightonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Garthwaite v. Bank of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Marsteller v. LeavittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API