Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Rosenberg
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided September 22, 1938PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
The facts underlying the present application have
heretofore been aired with some particularity in the reports. (See Matter of Rosenberg, 263 N. Y. 357; Matter of Rosenberg, 157 Misc. 490.) The salient circumstances are that Rose L. Schwobel, who was appointed administratrix of this estate, retained the present respondents, Groggins and Schneider, as her attorneys in its settlement and upon their representation that $7,750 was a proper remuneration for the services which they had rendered, paid them this sum in July, 1931.
Thereafter, in November, 1931, she instituted a proceeding in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Austin v. . MunroNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Ferrin v. . MyrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Downing v. . MarshallNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
- In re AndersonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
- In Re the Accounting of MaxwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Estate of David Smith, Deceased v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- In re the Estate of ZieglerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
- In re the Estate of AmicoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
- In re the Estate of DamskyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
- In re the Estate of FewerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.