Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Damsky

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 27, 1940PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Dodd, J.,

Acting Surrogate. The present application, whereas merely a routine motion for the examination of an opponent before trial pursuant to the provisions of section 288 of the Civil Practice Act, involves two legal questions which possess somewhat more than passing interest.

*461The main proceeding to which this motion is incidental is to compel the administrator to file and proceed to settle an account in his representative capacity. The petitioner alleges a status as a creditor of the estate and of the administrator in his fiduciary capacity, although, confessedly, the consideration upon…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Willis v. . SharpNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. O'Brien v. . JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. In re GorraNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  4. In re GlassNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  5. Shaffer v. BaconAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of O'BrienNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API