Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Ferguson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 13, 1934No. 1362PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

At a former day of this term, we overruled the motion of appellee Joe Lee Ferguson to affirm this case on certificate. The record presented in support-of the motion failed to disclose that an appeal had been perfected to this court. A. M. Ferguson, individually, gave notice of appeal, but did not file an appeal bond within the time provided by law, and later abandoned his appeal and prosecuted a writ of error. There was no showing in the record at that time that A. M. Ferguson as temporary administrator, who, under the statute, was not required to give bond on appeal, had given any notice of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Red v. BoundsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  2. Red v. BoundsTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Harding v. City of RaymondvilleTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  4. Hawkeye Securities Ins. v. CashionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Farmers' State Bank of Mineola v. MincherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Jarrell v. Farmers' & Merchants' State Bond BankTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API