Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Ferguson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 10, 1935No. 1439PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKMAN, Chief Justice.

A. M. Ferguson, individually, brings this case here by writ of error, and, as temporary administrator of the estate of Kate F. Morton, deceased, brings same by direct appeal, but, for convenience, he will be referred to in both capacities as appellant, and Joe Lee Ferguson will be referred to as appellee. The conclusions announced in this opinion can be better understood from a recital of the history of this involved litigation. The parties are the principal beneficiaries under the will of Kate F. Morton, deceased. On September 17, 1932, they entered into an arbitration…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Ferguson v. MauzeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bergeron v. SessionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API