Legal Opinion

Brady v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 13, 1963No. [No. 135, September Term, 1961.]PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bruñe, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

On this appeal from a denial of post conviction relief, the appellant, Brady, contends that he was deprived of a fair trial by reason of the fact that the State did not disclose at or before the trial that it then had in its possession a statement of his accomplice Boblit admitting that he, Boblit, had actually strangled the victim.

Boblit and Brady were each convicted of first degree murder in separate trials. Brady elected a jury trial and was tried first; Boblit elected a court trial. Each appealed from his conviction and the cases were argued…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Alcorta v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. People v. SavvidesNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. United States Ex Rel. Almeida v. BaldiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Cone v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. United States of America Ex Rel. Thomas Meers, Relator-Appellee v. Walter H. Wilkins, Warden of Attica State Prison, Attica, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  5. Milton M. Levin v. Nicholas Deb. Katzenbach, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API