Clark Milling Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The court can acquire no jurisdiction over a defendant’s property by attachment without a valid levy or a seizure, of his property by garnishment. Associated Press v. United Press, 104 Ga. 51 (2); Baker v. Aultman, 107 Ga. 339 (1) (29 S. E. 869); Massachusetts Bonding Co. v. U. S. Conservation Co., 31 Ga. App. 716 (122 S. E. 728); United Provisions Corp. v. Board of Missions, 33 Ga. App. 9 (1) (124 S. E. 820).
The defendant was not to be held as having appeared and pleaded to the merits merely because the pleading first filed was marked “answer,” since it…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Davis v. Farmers Co-Operative Equity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Davis v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Epps & Leabow v. BuckmasterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Southern Flour & Grain Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nutrena Mills, Inc. v. Parsons Feed & Farm Supply, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
- McDougall v. StonerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Dunn & McCarthy Inc. v. PinkstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Hinton-Bellah Inc. v. ThebitCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Alday v. SpoonerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926