Legal Opinion

McDougall v. Stoner

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 4, 1975No. 50154PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Presiding Judge.

Where a motion for new trial is defective in that no rule nisi signed by the trial judge is sought or obtained, setting the same for hearing and accompanied by service on the opposite party, and there is no amendment and no waiver, a motion to dismiss should be sustained.

There is no statute of limitation limiting the pendency of a motion for new trial, the filing of which nevertheless operates as a supersedeas of the judgment. Code Ann. § 81A-162 (b). Therefore, to allow a motion for new trial without the accompanying rule nisi setting a date for hearing would…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spivey v. MaysonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  2. Garrison v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Clark Milling Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  4. Farmers Protective Fire Insurance v. Portrum & AltmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  5. Sweatman v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adrian Housing Corp. v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  2. Gold Kist, Inc. v. StokesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Bekaert Steel Wire Corp. v. Georgia Subsequent Injury Trust FundCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. McDougall v. StonerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. Hodges v. Doctors HospitalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API