Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP PENNSYLVANIA. The facts are stated in the opinion. There was also a separate brief by Mr. Edward S. Hatch and Mr. J. Stuart Tompkins in behalf of certain importers having similar interests.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
This case was argued and submitted with No. 269.
The appellant imported and entered at the 'port of Philadelphia on September 29, 1903, certain sugars, the product of the Republic of Cuba. The collector imposed on all the sugars the full rate imposed by the tariff act of July 24, 1897. Permits for the removal of all the sugars for consumption from bonded warehoúse were issued to appellant before December 17,1903, and all removéd for consumption before that date except 1,250 bags, which were removed December 28, and 3,279 bags and 67 bags of sweepings on December 29.
It is contended (1) that all…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
3Cited by13 opinions
- M. H. Pulaski Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. Cronkhite Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- May Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Hudson Shipping Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
- Parfums Corday, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.