Legal Opinion

Parfums Corday, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 2, 1942No. C. D. 597PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Judge:

These are suits brought at the port of New York against the United States for the recovery of money claimed to have *162been improperly exacted as customs duties on an importation of empty glass bottles from France. Counsel have agreed that the merchandise consists of empty bottles of the character used for containers of perfume, produced otherwise than by automatic machine. The collector of customs assessed duty thereon at the rate of 75 per centum ad valorem under the provision in. paragraph 218 (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930 for—

Bottles and jars, wholly or in chief value of glass,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. United States v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Hartranft v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Fabbri v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. City of Mankato v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mussman & Shafer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  2. Atlas Fibers Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  3. J. Einstein, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  4. Waitt & Bond, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  5. Waitt & Bond, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API