Legal Opinion

Delgue v. Curutchet

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1984No. 5831, 5832PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*210THOMAS, Justice.

The essential substantive question which is presented by these cases involves the right of a lessee to make use of an appurtenant easement established by prescription in favor of the lands which.he is leasing. In order to resolve this essential substantive question the court must first concern itself with whether the related doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel preclude an attempt by the lessee to establish his right to use of the easement because of language in the judgment establishing the easement which purports to exclude lessees. The trial court ruled that…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Rick Morgan v. City of Rawlins and Abe DeherreraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  2. Matter of Paternity of JRWWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Tenorio v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In Re Rights to Use Water in Big Horn RiverWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Rialto Theatre, Inc. v. Commonwealth Theatres, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API