Legal Opinion
In Re Heston
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 18, 1998No. C-970265PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants Charles and Beverly Heston appeal from the decision of the Hamilton County Juvenile Court awarding permanent custody of their children, Elizabeth and Sarah Heston, to the appellee, Hamilton County Department of Human Services (“DHS”).
Pursuant to R.C. 2151.414(E)(1), the trial court found by clear and convincing evidence that, following removal of the children and notwithstanding the efforts of DHS to remedy the sexual and physical abuse inflicted by two older brothers and by an uncle, the Hestons had failed continuously and repeatedly to substantially remedy the conditions and had…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- In the Interest of K.L.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Jones v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- In Re Brooks, Unpublished Decision (7-22-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- In re R.L.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
- In re R.D.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.