Legal Opinion
Cronauer v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 2005No. CIV.A.04-1355(RBW)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
The plaintiff brings this personal injury action pursuant to the Federal Torts Claims Act (“FTCA” or the “Act”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671, et seq. (2000) for injuries sustained as a result of the alleged negligence of the defendants. Currently before the Court is the United States’ Motion to Dismiss (“Def.’s Mot.”) [D.E. # 16] pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). For the following reasons, the Court grants the motion to dismiss due to the absence of subject matter jurisdiction.
I. Background
The adult plaintiffs, Patricia Cronauer and Christian…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Joseph F. Cada v. Baxter Healthcare CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Himex Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Deppner v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Himex Company, Inc. v. U.S. Customs and Border ProtectionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Jackson v. Gmac, InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.