Legal Opinion
Harriett v. Lusk
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 13, 1958No. 6234PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUJAN, Chief Justice.
Plaintiffs-appellants, acting individually, as members of the Socorro County Board of Education, and the Board acting in its corporate capacity, brought this action seeking injunctive and declaratory relief against the Superintendent of Public Instruction, the Members of the State Board of Education, the Director of Transportation, the Educational Budget Auditor, the County Treasurer of Socorro County, and of the Socorro Municipal Board of Education, all both individually and in their several official capacities. Appellants sought to restrain defendants-appellees from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Taos County Board of Education v. SedilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Arnold v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
- Continental Oil Co. v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
- Lorenzino v. State ex rel. JamesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
- State v. MooreNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Bird v. ApodacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Castillo Corp. v. New Mexico State Tax CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Maloney v. SierraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- City of Albuquerque v. BurrellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Nash v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs of Catron Cnty. and Belen Consol. Sch. Dist. v. Valencia Cnty.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.