Legal Opinion

Eisenberg v. Reasenberg

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.

Before serving his answer, defendant moves under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint, consisting of three causes of action, for insufficiency. The first cause of action alleges a libel by reason of the composition and sending of a certain letter by the defendant, on or about February 26, 1926, to the Collector of Customs, Custom House, New York. The letter in effect states that the defendant had been informed that the plaintiff purchased certain goods, wares and merchandise in Europe in the line of smokers’ articles and other articles, caused the same to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Quarles and ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Andrews v. . GardinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Pecue v. . WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Villemin v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  5. Hyman v. Press Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roberts v. PrattNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Mishkin v. RoreckNew York Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API