Express Recovery Services, Inc. v. Rice
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
ORME, Judge:
¶ 1 Defendant Scott Rice claims the trial court erred in concluding that he is personally liable on a contract he signed in his capacity as an officer of Memory Technologies, Inc. (MTI). The facts here are not in dispute, and we review the trial court’s decision under a correction of error standard. See Zions First Nat’l Bank v. National Am. Title Ins. Co., 749 P.2d 651, 653 (Utah 1988) (“Questions of contract interpretation not requiring resort to extrinsic evidence are matters of law, and on such questions we accord the trial court’s interpretation no…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zions First National Bank, N.A. v. National American Title Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
- Wilburn v. Interstate ElectricCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
- Smith v. BowmanUtah Supreme Court · 1907
- Wilburn v. Interstate ElectricUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Murphy v. CroslandCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bank of America, N.A. v. Jill P. Mitchell Living TrustDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Fort Pierce Industrial Park Phases II, III, & IV Owners Ass'n v. ShakespeareUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- Meadow Valley Contractors, Inc. v. State Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Daniels v. Elks Club of Hartford and the Human Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- DBL Distrubuting, Inc v. 1 Cache, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.