Legal Opinion

VESTERHALT v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 26, 2009No. 07 Civ. 2142(MGC)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CEDARBAUM, District Judge.

Plaintiff Maxine Vesterhalt sues defendants for false arrest, use of excessive force, and unreasonable search of her residence under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. She also sues the individual defendants for trespass and assault and battery under New York state law. Defendants move to enforce settlement with Vesterhalt or, in the alternative, for summary judgment on her claims. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion to enforce settlement is denied. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part.

BACKGROUND

I. Undisputed Facts

Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jackson v. TelladoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
  2. D.H. v. City of N.Y.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Gonzalez v. Waterbury Police Dept.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
  4. Alcantara v. DonaghueDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
  5. Baker v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API