Barran v. Roden
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
LIVINGSTON, Chief Justice.
This is' an appeal taken by complainants .from a decree in .equity sustaining a demurrer to an alleged aspect o.f th.e bill, but overruling the demurrer to the bill as a whole and to the other aspects of it.
An appeal will lie under Sec. 755, Title -7,' Code of 1940, by complainants to review a decree sustaining a demurrer to an aspect of a bill in equity. Steele v. Freeman, 250 Ala. 336, 34 So.2d 139; American Life Ins. Co. v. Powell, 260 Ala. 574, 71 So.2d 872. This is not in conflict with McCary v. Davis, 257 Ala. 456, 59 So.2d 569.
Appellee moved to dismiss the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wilks v. WilksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Francis v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Gibson v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Steele v. FreemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Endsley v. DarringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Foster v. Greer and Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Osborn v. RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- BF Goodrich Company v. ButlerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- Reeves v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Reynolds v. Colonial BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.