Conseco, Inc. v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Employment & Training Services
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Conseco, Inc. appeals the decision of the Review Board of the Indiana Department of Employment and Training Services (“Review Board”) which found that Danita Gilbert (“Gilbert”) was entitled to full unemployment compensation benefits because she was not discharged by Conseco for “just cause” within the meaning of the Indiana Employment Security Act, Indiana Code § 22-4-15-1. Conseco contends that the decision of the Review Board is contrary to law and must be reversed.1 We disagree and affirm.
ISSUE
Whether the Review Board’s conclusion that Gilbert was not…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Osborn v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Arvin North American Automotive v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Employment & Training ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Frank v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Byrd v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Bishop v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Employment & Training ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Browning-Ferris Industries v. Review Board of Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Bartholomew County, Indiana v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development, and Robert L. AmosIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Conseco, Inc. v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Employment & Training ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993