Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Sullivan v. Tazwell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1927PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

A Circuit Court judge is an officer subject to mandamus within the purview of Section 613, Or. L.: Johnson v. Tucker, 85 Or. 646 (167 Pac. 787); State ex rel. v. Bradshaw, 59 Or. 279 (117 Pac. 284); Che Gong v. Stearns, 16 Or. 219, 223 (17 Pac. 871). The purpose of the writ of mandamus is to “compel the performance of an act which the law especially enjoins, as a duty resulting from an office, * * .” Section 613, above.

It appears from the alternative writ that defendant as circuit judge sustained the motion to quash the service of the summons in the action of relator against said steamship…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Engel v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. In Re HohorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Panama Railroad v. VasquezSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. In Re Connaway as Receiver of the Moscow National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Smith v. CooperOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State Ex Rel. Ricco v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Bainbridge v. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc. v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  5. State Ex Rel. Maizels v. JubaOregon Supreme Court · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API