In Re Connaway as Receiver of the Moscow National Bank
Supreme Court of the United States
ORIGINAL. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
delivered the opinion.of the court.
This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to the Judges of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Ninth Circuit and District of California, which substantially shows as follows:
The Moscow National Bank of Moscow, Idaho, was a corporation organized under the national banking laws of the United States, with its place of business at Moscow, Idaho.
The bank, becoming insolvent, was closed by order of the Comptroller of the Currency of the United States, and taken control of by that officer.
On January 3, 1898, he appointed petitioner receiver of the bank’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Schreiber v. SharplessSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Green v. WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. JoySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Henshaw v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Sullivan v. Associated Billposters & Distributors of United States & CanadaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- C. Gilmore v. C. LockardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- State ex rel. Umbreit v. HelmsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Mengel v. Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- State Ex Rel. County of Musselshell v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1931
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.