Legal Opinion

Red Zone LLC v. Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 2013PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Melvin L. Schweitzer, J.

The plaintiff claims that the defendant committed legal malpractice. The plaintiff has moved for summary judgment. The defendant opposes the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and moves for summary judgment against the claims.

Background

Facts Relating to Malpractice

The court finds the following facts relating to the issue of legal malpractice. While Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP disputes several points, it has not introduced evidence that is sufficient to demonstrate any material issue of fact with the following account.

In 2004, Red Zone LLC…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Andre v. PomeroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Gilbert Frank Corp. v. Federal InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Glamm v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. AmBase Corp. v. Davis Polk & WardwellNew York Court of Appeals · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Town of Amherst v. WeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Applied Energetics, Inc. v. Gusrae Kaplan Nusbaum PLLC and Ryan WhalenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
  3. Town of Amherst v. WeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API