Legal Opinion

Wickizer v. Warner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 8, 1924No. 11091PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action for the recovery of land commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiffs in error, defendants below. Upon trial to the court there was judgment in fav-of the plaintiff as prayed for, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced.

The land involved was the allotment of Tecumseh Tiger, a full-blood Creek Indian, who died during the year 1900, before receiving his allotment, the patent therefor being subsequently issued to his heirs. It appears that the allottee left surviving him a nephew', Albert Tiger, and his wife, Judy Tiger. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brockman v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Brockman v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Warner v. WickizerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API