Legal Opinion
United States v. Alamosa County, Colo.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided February 5, 2004No. 1:01-cv-02275PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORRECTED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
(This Corrected Memorandum Opinion and Order is issued solely to correct a typographical error at the number of counties listed on page 2, III. A, paragraph 1.)
KRIEGER, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court following a nine-day bench trial. At trial, the Plaintiff, the United States of America, was represented by Thomas Reed, Tricia Jefferson, and Edward Keefe from the United States Department of Justice. The Defendants, Alamosa County, the Alamosa County Board of Commissioners, Robert Zimmerman, Darius Allen, Charlotte Bo-bicki and Holly Z.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- South Carolina v. KatzenbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Volma Overton, and Ernesto Calderon, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants v. City of Austin, and Black Citizens Task Force, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Sanchez v. ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shirt v. HazeltineDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2004
- United States v. City of EuclidDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Large v. Fremont County, Wyo.District Court, D. Wyoming · 2010
- United States v. City of EastpointeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
- Rodriguez v. Bexar County TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.