Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Wright v. First National Bank

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 5, 1996No. 16457Published

1Concurrence

HARTZ, Judge (specially concurring).

15. I concur in the result. I agree that Plaintiffs attorney should receive his attorney’s fees in full and that Lovelace should receive the amount of the judgment remaining after payment of attorney’s fees and costs. I write separately, however, because my understanding of how to handle attorney’s fees under the hospital-lien statute differs from the majority’s.

16. I base my understanding of the hospital-lien statute on a consideration of what would happen in the absence of such a statute. In that event a hospital could sue a patient for the unpaid medical…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City and County of San Francisco v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Amica Mutual Insurance v. MaloneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Martinez v. St. Joseph Healthcare SystemNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. American Fidelity Co. v. BleakleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. Hardwick v. HarrisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API