Legal Opinion

Hardwick v. Harris

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1917No. 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from District Court, Eddy County; Richardson, Judge. Suit by E. R. Hardwick against W. B. Harris and others; E. F. Hardwick, garnishee. Miotion to dismiss garnishment proceedings sustained, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT.

PARKER, J.

Appellant brought this action upon a judgment obtained by one J. P. Dyer and assigned to the appellant. The appellant caused a writ of garnishment to issue against E. E. Hardwick, who made answer that he was indebted to the defendant in a certain sum of money on account of a judgment rendered against him in the Supreme Court of the state. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss the garnishment proceeding on the ground that the debt sought to be garnished was not subject to garnishment in the district court, it being a debt by a judgment of the Supreme Court and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gager v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1836
  2. Luton v. HoehnIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Scott v. RohmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Jones v. St. OngeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Gridley v. HarradenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1780

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wright v. First National BankNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API