Legal Opinion

Preuss v. Schoonover

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 4, 1964No. 20644PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Pringle.

Plaintiff in error, Goldie Preuss, was the plaintiff in the trial court and defendants in error were defendants there.

Plaintiff sought to recover for injuries allegedly sustained when a truck in which she was riding was struck from the rear by a truck driven by the defendant Schoonover. She alleged that she had suffered temporary and permanent injury, great pain and suffering, medical expense and future medical expense and loss of earnings, all to her damage in the amount of $40,000.00.

Trial was to the court which awarded the plaintiff $300.00 as compensation for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lehrer v. LorenzenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  2. Bigler v. RichardsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  3. Cottingham v. Star Bus LineSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  4. Staples v. LangleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. Venetucci v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Koontz v. RosenerColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Bohlender v. OsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  3. Muhe v. MitchellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  4. Archuleta v. ValenciaWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Archuleta v. ValenciaWyoming Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API