Legal Opinion
Koontz v. Rosener
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided January 18, 1990No. 87CA1733PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge HUME.
Plaintiffs, Carl Koontz, Diane Koontz, Wayne Newsom, and John Murphy, appeal the judgment that dismissed their claims seeking compensation from defendant, Greg Rosener, for services rendered as employees, and awarded defendant damages on his counterclaims. Defendant cross-appeals those portions of the judgment that awarded plaintiffs an offset for commissions against his damage award, dismissed his third-party claim for unjust enrichment against Estes Village Properties, Ltd. (Estes), and limited his recovery for claimed attorney fees. We affirm in part, reverse in part,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jet Courier Service, Inc. v. MuleiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Baldwin v. Bright Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Ficor, Inc. v. McHughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. AndrewsColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Ballow v. PHICO Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Leonard v. McMorrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- Wells Fargo Realty Advisors Funding, Inc. v. Uioli, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Tallitsch v. Child Support Services, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Husband v. Colorado Mountain Cellars, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1993
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.