Legal Opinion

Archuleta v. Valencia

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1994No. 93-152PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

Appellant, a passenger injured in a single vehicle accident, brought an action against appellee, the driver of the vehicle, to recover damages. Appellant contends the jury’s award of damages was inadequate as a matter of law, and she appeals the district court’s denial of both her motion to amend the judgment and her alternative motion for a new trial.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Appellant presents the following statement of the issues:

Whether the amount awarded to the appellant (plaintiff below) for non-eeonomic damages and for physical impairment and disfigurement [was] inadequate given…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Duke v. HousenWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Kistler v. HalseySupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  3. Mince v. ButtersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. Ball Ex Rel. Ball v. BallWyoming Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Coulthard v. CossairtWyoming Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dewey v. WentlandWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Tolman v. Stryker Corp.District Court, D. Wyoming · 2013
  3. Tribe v. PetersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Archuleta v. ValenciaWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. John A. Mccall, Jr. v. Best of the West Productions, Llc, a Wyoming Limited Liability Company; Huskemaw Optics, Llc, a Wyoming Limited Liability Company; Jack Peterson, Individually and as Manager of Best of the West Productions, Llc; and Botw Holdings, Llc, a Wyoming Limited Liability CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API