Legal Opinion

American Federation of Government Employees, Council 33 v. Barr

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 12, 1992No. C-88-1419 SAWPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

WEIGEL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs sued to enjoin an allegedly unconstitutional drug testing program. The program was instituted by the United States Department of Justice for employees of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (the “Bureau”). Plaintiffs are a union that represents Bureau employees. In June 1988, this Court granted plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction and enjoined the testing of any Bureau employee absent reasonable suspicion that drug use by that employee impaired his or her ability to perform official duty. American Federation of Government Employees, Council 33 v.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Department of the Navy v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Mark B. Harmon v. Richard L. Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  5. National Treasury Employees Union v. Clayton Yeutter, Secretary, United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. AMERICAN FED. OF GOV. EMPLOYEES v. BarrDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API