Legal Opinion

Williams v. Tide Water Associated Oil Co.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided November 16, 1954No. 3395PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOLDT, District Judge.

In a complaint labeled “In Law” and containing a jury trial demand, plaintiff sought recovery for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained from a fall on the deck of the defendant’s tanker S. S. Tidewater. At the time plaintiff seaman and others of the crew were carrying a large hose across the deck. It was alleged that defendant was negligent in failing to have the deck painted with-“non skid” paint and in permitting an oil spill to be and remain on the deck at the point of plaintiff’s fall. The verdict was in favor of defendant and plaintiff has moved for a new…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Engel v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. The Arizona v. AnelichSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vance W. Williams v. Tide Water Associated Oil Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  2. United States v. JannuzzioDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1958
  3. Cepo v. BrownellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API