Legal Opinion

Bachelder v. Brown

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1882PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Jackson. Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

Brown, as executor of the will of Mary Thorp, brought suit in justice’s court against Bachelder and Gross on a promissory note dated March 26, 1879, made by Bachelder payable to the order of Gross and by Gross •endorsed in blank. The general issue was pleaded, and this admitted the plaintiff’s representative character. Vickery v. Beir 16 Mich. 50. The plaintiff had judgment before the justice.

On the trial in the circuit court on appeal, the plaintiff put the note in evidence and rested on this prima faeie ■case. In defense evidence was then offered tending to show that the note did not belong…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Key v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Stoddard v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  3. Lessee v. DunningSupreme Court of the United States · 1792
  4. Downey v. AndrusMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Weinstein & Bro. v. PatrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Douthitt v. MacCulskyWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Lorimer v. LorimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Penny v. CroulMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. People ex rel. Clinton v. LaninsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Carpenter v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API