Legal Opinion

Jamal Randell Solomon v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 23, 2015No. 14-CF-87PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Associate Judge:

The District’s unlawful possession of a firearm (“UPF”) statute prohibits any person who has been convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year from possessing a firearm. D.C.Code § 22-4503(a)(l) (2012 Repl.). A recent amendment to the Youth Rehabilitation Amendment Act of 1985 (‘Youth Act”) extended this prohibition to persons whose convictions have been set aside under the Youth Act. D.C.Code § 24-906(f)(8) (2012 Repl.). After this amendment took effect, Jamal Solomon was arrested for and convicted of UPF; his prior conviction for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  2. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Carmell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Garner v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Stogner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arthur v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. Carruth v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
  3. G.W. v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. Hickerson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. Sharps and Jordan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API