Legal Opinion

In Re the Discipline of Ortner

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2005No. NonePublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Following the release of this Court’s decision in Reaser v. Reaser, 2004 SD 116, 688 N.W.2d 429, the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar of South Dakota generated a complaint against Michael P. Ortner. Following its investigation and hearing in the matter, the Disciplinary Board filed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a formal accusation against Ort-ner. This Board recommended that Ort-ner be publicly censured for his violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Ortner admitted the allegations in the formal accusation that followed. When an accused…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. In Re SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Cummings v. MickelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Petition of PierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In Re the Discipline of DorothySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Ochs v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pietrzak v. SchroederSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. In Re Discipline of JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In Re the Matter of Discipline of ReynoldsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In Re the Formal Inquiry Concerning FullerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Discipline of FrauenshuhSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API