Legal Opinion

Pietrzak v. Schroeder

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 2009No. 24729PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Mike Schroeder filed a Petition for Change of Custody of his five-year-old son, Thomas. Custody of the child originally had been stipulated to by the parties. Mike alleged the conduct of the child’s *737mother, Joleen Pietrzak, required a change in custody in order to serve Thomas’s best interest and welfare. The trial court concluded a change in custody was required. We reverse.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] The minor child in this matter, Thomas, was born to Joleen Pietrzak (Jo-leen) and Mike Schroeder (Mike), on October 22, 2001, after the breakup of the parties’ brief…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Fuerstenberg v. FuerstenbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Arneson v. ArnesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Jasper v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Kolb v. KolbSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Williams v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Schieffer v. SchiefferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Kreps v. KrepsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Nickles v. NicklesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Johnson v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Stavig v. StavigSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API