Legal Opinion
O'DONNELL v. Kusper
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 21, 1985No. 83 C 9717PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSZKOWSKI, District Judge.
Before the court are defendants’ various motions to dismiss and motions for sanctions. Also before the court is plaintiff’s motion to file a Second Amended Complaint. The court’s subject matter jurisdiction is asserted to rest upon 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (1982) and 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (1982). For the reasons set forth herein, defendants’ motions to dismiss are granted and defendants’ motions for sanctions are denied. Plaintiff’s motion to file a Second Amended Complaint is also denied.
BACKGROUND
On December 30, 1983, plaintiff, Raymond O’Donnell, a resident taxpayer of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Larson v. ValenteSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. GrayheckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Alcorn County, Mississippi v. U.S. Interstate Supplies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- In Re Industrial Gas Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. ScalettyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
- Francis v. Recycling Solutions, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Rinke v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- State of Illinois Ex Rel. Walter E. Ryan and Bernard McKay v. Terry BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Mathews v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.