Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. New York Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 19, 1929PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerrell, J.

The action is brought by plaintiff as administrator of the goods, chattels and credits of Ben Goldstein, deceased, to recover of the defendant New York Life Insurance Company the sum of $30,000 upon.seven policies of life insurance issued by defendant upon the life of plaintiff’s intestate. In plaintiff’s complaint he alleges the issuance by the defendant, appellant, of the seven policies of life insurance, all payable to the defendant Lefkowitz as sole beneficiary. Two causes of action are stated in the complaint as to each policy. Under the terms of the several policies as originally issued…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New York Mutual Life Insurance v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Spicer v. New York Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1920
  3. Goldstein v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1928
  4. People v. LefkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. De Zoteel v. Mutual Life InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Meyer v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. John Hancock Life Insurance v. PerchikovDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
  4. Boatwright v. Hartford Insurance GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  5. Estate of Grieco v. Bankers American Life Assurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API