Legal Opinion

Newton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 2, 1923No. 7235PublishedCited by 28 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Wood County of the possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

Appellant moved to quash the indictment because the law under which same was drawn was in conflict with the Volstead act. The motion was properly overruled. Ex parte Gilmore, 88 Texas Crim. Rep., 529, 228 S. W. Rep., 199.

Appellant asked for a continuance because of the absence of three witnesses. The bill of exceptions shows that two of them appeared during the trial, and in our opinion the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GilmoreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Williamson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Oates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
  5. Staton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Herrera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Harbin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Andrews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API