Legal Opinion

Harris v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 9, 1927No. 10365PublishedCited by 20 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for aggravated assault and battery, the punishment being nine months imprisonment in jail.

Appellant sought a continuance on account of the absence of the witness Nichols. It is conceded by the state that proper diligence is shown to secure the attendance of this witness but insists that if the witness had been present he would not have been permitted to testify to the things set out in the application for continuance because they are conclusions only and not statements of any fact. We are inclined to believe this criticism of the application is well founded.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Linder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Oates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  3. Hickox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Newton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Fry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Jennings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. Bolden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. McMurrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Clepper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
  5. Lydia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API