Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 25, 1911No. 1161PublishedCited by 23 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

The appellant was indicted, tried and convicted -of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors in Wood Counl y after prohibition bad been properly carried, declared in force, etc., on March 12, 1910. The unlawful sale is alleged to have occurred on or about August 15, 1910.

The evidence by the State clearly and without question establishes the guilt of the 'appellant and makes a clear case against him. "We deem it unnecessary to state the testimony.

The appellant made a motion to quash the indictment. The first ground was “because it was vague, uncertain' and indefinite and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brittain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. Ware v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Fannin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. Hunter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Conway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Williamson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Newton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Clayton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Holmes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Marshall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API