Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Lock

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 5, 1963No. 16,237Published

1ConcurrenceKilday, Judge

(concurring in the result) :

I concur in the result.

I agree with the result reached by my brothers. However, my conclusion is reached by a route so different from theirs that I find it necessary to state my view.

I do not agree with the Government’s contention that the accused was not denied an out-of-court hearing on volun-tariness as defense counsel indicated his desire to present evidence touching voluntariness before the court-martial; nor that the comments of counsel and the law officer, regarding an out-of-court hearing, related to the direct testimony of a Government witness, and could…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  2. United States v. DicarioUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. CooperUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  4. United States v. CatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. YoungUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API