Legal Opinion

People v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1950No. Civ. 14158PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

In an action for declaratory relief brought by plaintiff, People of the State of California, against defendants Globe and Rutgers Fire Insurance Company, a corporation, 1 and Carl N. Swenson Company, a corporation, 2 plaintiff recovered judgment against Globe in the sum of $2,051.01. Judgment that plaintiff take nothing was rendered in favor of Swenson. Globe alone appealed.

Facts

Although the items are disputed, there is practically no dispute as to the facts. The State of California, through the Board of State Harbor Commissioners, in 1943 entered into a contract with Swenson under which the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. White Star S. S. Co. v. North British & Mercantile Ins.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1943
  2. Boole v. Union Marine Ins. Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Canton Ins. Office, Ltd. v. WoodsideCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
  4. Ciconett v. Home Ins.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1948
  5. Indianapolis Insurance v. MasonIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frame v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Gamer v. duPont Glore Forgan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Witcher Construction Co. v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API